Podcast Review: January 2008 1st Edition

In the Science Podcast of December 5th 2008 there is coverage of foetal immunity to maternal antigens using T-cells in a different way to adults.There is also discussion of a study of the ‘placebo effect’ with evidence for a genetic variation in serotonin production in those who responded to placebo in a social anxiety scenario. In drawing this final conclusion we must make a number of assumptions including a negligible background variation in confounders, the existence of the placebo effect as a valid biological construct and not representative of statistical confounders and the efficient and relevant to the experimental paradigm expression of the gene.

In the Science Podcast of December 19th 2008 there is coverage of a number of big science stories from 2008 and these included new gene sequencing technologies, the sequencing of human genomes and cell reprogramming. Predicted big stories for next year are speciation genes, that is genes that keep species from interbreeding, and also neuroscience in courts.

In the Science Podcast of December 23rd 2008 there is coverage of stories from 2008 including an MRI study of decision making in which activation was found to precede conscious awareness of the decisions by 10 seconds.

In the Nature Podcast of December 11th 2008 there is a discussion of the effect of the financial crisis on world food supplies and the potential benefits of increasing funding for agricultural research to address these issues. There is also a discussion of the so-called ‘smart drugs’ and the ethics of making these more widely available. One of the authors of a Nature article on this topic appears on the podcast to discuss this further including estimated figures of between 4 and 25% of people on campuses using these.

In the Nature Podcast of December 18th 2008 there is discussion of learning in songbirds where it was found that a single type of song presented on two occasions was sufficient to produce learning. There is also a discussion of the construction of the first artificial genome as well as personal genomics.


The comments made here represent the opinions of the author and do not represent the profession or any body/organisation. The comments made here are not meant as a source of medical advice and those seeking medical advice are advised to consult with their own doctor. The author is not responsible for the contents of any external sites that are linked to in this blog.

One comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s