CSF Markers in CADASIL

There is a paper on CADASIL and CSF biomarkers by Formichi and colleagues in the International Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease freely available here. As CADASIL (Cerebral Autosomal Dominant Arteriopathy)(see reviews here and here) is an unambiguous model of vascular dementia the researchers compared people with CADASIL and Alzheimer’s Disease with the intention of clarifying useful biomarkers for discrimating between both conditions.  Firstly the study is fairly small – there are 10 people with CADASIL being compared with 22 people with Alzheimer’s Disease and 17 controls with polyneuropathy (the control group is an interesting choice). Nevertheless given the prevalence of CADASIL in the population it might be difficult to recruit the larger numbers that might result from power calculations and so in some senses this might be considered a pilot study. The diagnosis of CADASIL was determined genetically and cognitive impairment was assessed using the MMSE. Although the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease was made using the NINCDS-ADRDA criterion there is an an advantage in establishing CADASIL related vascular dementia using the NINCDS-AIREN criteria and with more detailed neuropsychological testing. The groups are compared using CSF biomarkers – ABeta42, t-tau and p-tau. Pairwise group comparisons with Bonferroni corrections are detailed with the reasoning in the methods section. The clear findings were that the people with Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) had a statistically significant elevation in CSF p-tau and t-tau levels compared to the other groups. However Table 1 shows the characteristics of the CADASIL group and the MMSE data shows most of the subjects producing scores in the mid-twenties. Thus the questions that can be asked are ‘what proportion of the CADASIL group are experiencing vascular dementia’ and ‘is there enough data to draw such conclusions?’. Nevertheless even if this cannot reasonably be concluded, the comparison will be contrasting two types of pathology albeit at different stages of cognitive impairment. For this reason a comparison of MMSE scores in both groups would have been interesting although of limited utility. The researchers discuss some of the limitations of the study while focusing on the potential for the tau markers to represent useful biomarkers discriminating between AD and VaD.

Index: An index of the site can be found here. The page contains links to all of the articles in the blog in chronological order. Twitter: You can follow ‘The Amazing World of Psychiatry’ Twitter by clicking on this link. Podcast: You can listen to this post on Odiogo by clicking on this link (there may be a small delay between publishing of the blog article and the availability of the podcast). It is available for a limited period. TAWOP Channel: You can follow the TAWOP Channel on YouTube by clicking on this link. Responses: If you have any comments, you can leave them below or alternatively e-mail justinmarley17@yahoo.co.uk. Disclaimer: The comments made here represent the opinions of the author and do not represent the profession or any body/organisation. The comments made here are not meant as a source of medical advice and those seeking medical advice are advised to consult with their own doctor. The author is not responsible for the contents of any external sites that are linked to in this blog.

One thought on “CSF Markers in CADASIL

  1. bet365 italia

    hi!This was a really outstanding Topics!
    I come from roma, I was luck to discover your theme in baidu
    Also I obtain much in your Topics really thanks very much i will come again

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s