There is a study by Alessandro Biffi and colleagues titled ‘Screening for Familial APP Mutations in Sporadic Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy’ and which is freely available here. The researchers are interested in answering the question ‘Should we be screening for familial Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy gene mutations or novel mutations in sporadic Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy’. This condition has relevance to vascular dementia. The Boston criteria the researchers use for the diagnosis are given in Table 1 and based on these criteria they divide up cases into probable or definite Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy (CAA). They identified 58 subjects, 35 having probable CAA and 23 having confirmed CAA. They examined the APP gene and four flanking genes and found no evidence of the novel or familial mutations in their sample. They from this study they found no evidence to support the screening of this population with the stated markers. The researchers note that they have restricted screening to currently identified mutations. They also suggest that mutations in exons 16 and 17 will be of low frequency and corresponding low risk (at the population level). They recommend larger replications studies to further investigate the relationship between APP variants and spontaneous CAA. One of the neat features of this paper is that a practical question is given an explicit evidence based response in the discussion.
Index: An index of the site can be found here. The page contains links to all of the articles in the blog in chronological order. Twitter: You can follow ‘The Amazing World of Psychiatry’ Twitter by clicking on this link. Podcast: You can listen to this post on Odiogo by clicking on this link (there may be a small delay between publishing of the blog article and the availability of the podcast). It is available for a limited period. TAWOP Channel: You can follow the TAWOP Channel on YouTube by clicking on this link. Responses: If you have any comments, you can leave them below or alternatively e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org. Disclaimer: The comments made here represent the opinions of the author and do not represent the profession or any body/organisation. The comments made here are not meant as a source of medical advice and those seeking medical advice are advised to consult with their own doctor. The author is not responsible for the contents of any external sites that are linked to in this blog.